Ignorant Electorate
Journal Entry: Thu May 1, 2008, 8:57 PM
- Listening to: The two stupid dogs fighting
- Reading: Various
- Watching: My screen
- Playing: with PhotoShop
- Eating: Very little... i'm a big fat ass
- Drinking: Water. See above.
What will it take for our leaders to be elected based on good reasons, not fear and stupidity?
I keep seeing questions about this, and having the same question posed to me quite often: what do you think it will take to change the direction of this country? Most think it starts with the President, and that in 2009 one way or another things will change. I whole heartedly disagree with this, and believe especially that if McCain is elected, the difference between 2009-2013 will be minimal compared to 2001-2009. Even if Obama or Clinton win, I still don't see much really changing.
I believe that the larger problem is with the voters, not the people who are elected. Those who cry for change must be willing to elect the person / people who will bring about change. This doesn't, unfortunately, start at the top. It starts at the bottom on the local level and works upward to the highest elected offices in the US. In any elected office, you are only as powerful as the people around / below you will allow you to be.
I personally don't believe this will ever really happen. The electorate is just too ignorant. I'm guilty of this myself, just as many people are. I don't research every person running for local office like I should. I do my research on the folks running for president, governor, and sometimes mayor, and always the judges.
Nationally, for the most part, I feel that people voting aren't educating themselves enough to realize that the issues aren't what Obama's pastor believes; nobody is trying to elect Reverend Wright as President. The people voting aren't educating themselves to realize that Clinton may have been wrong about the sniper fire in Bosnia, but that's hardly an issue. The people voting aren't educating themselves enough to realize that the Republican fear tactics about national security are just that: fear tactics.
The electorate needs to inform themselves on all issues, and on true issues, not what somebody's pastor says or husband says. I do believe that you are judged by the company you keep, but in all honesty, doesn't every one of us have that one person in our lives that we love dearly, but just don't agree with?
Maybe if people really took the time to research the candidates instead of listening to the media, reading e-mails, and watching the talking heads on TV pull out sound bytes... maybe then things would begin to change.
I believe that is what got us to where we are today. Ask about 73% of Americans (based on Bush's 27% approval rating) and I think they would all answer Ronald Regan's question "are you better off now than you were four years ago?" with a resounding "NO!"
A quote I really like that is often attributed to Albert Einstein sums up this election, and perhaps this country, very well: "the thinking that got us into this mess is not sufficient to get us out."
(also quoted as: "The thinking it took to get us into this mess is not the same thinking that is going to get us out of it." And more appropriately, though most certainly not Einstein in origin: "Stupidity got us into this mess, why can't it get us out?")
Devious Comments
Sorry, I don't agree. Obama brought his children to that church on a (weekly?) basis, and we know now that Rev. Wright was spewing the same vile, hate-filled rhetoric he is now. While I can grant Obama, barely, his "crazy uncle" excuse regarding his own relationship with Rev. Wright, I believe exposing your children to this kind of racial hate-mongering shows a remarkable lack of judgment. In addition, I find the Senator's claim that he doesn't recognize Rev. Wright as the man he's known for the past 20 years intellectually insulting.
On Senator Clinton's "misremembering" of the Bosnia visit - sorry, can't agree with you there either. That showed me a candidate who will say nearly anything to gain more power. It also, as with Obama's weasel words about the good Reverend, is insulting to me as a reasonably intelligent person.
I'm huge non-fan of Reverend Wright, I'll get that out of the way first. Since I've never been to that church, I also don't know if he spews the same hate-filled BS on a weekly basis, and I hope and doubt he does. But I also don't think that you can judge someone completely based on their pastor. The pastor of the church where I was brought up and baptised and spent really the first 18 years of my life said some things that really made me want to get up and leave. And had I had my own car... That doesn't make him a bad person, it makes his opinions clash with mine. And they were some pretty hateful things, too. My parents, who obviously raised me from birth, have said some pretty hateful things around me, to me, and even about me. That doesn't mean they're bad people, it means they have some opinions that STRONGLY clash with mine.
I'm also a huge non-fan of Clinton. She'll say or do anything to get elected. Pennsylvania was a great one. "I grew up here, shootin' guns with grandpa, elect me." All that while she's in favor of gun control? "I dodged bullets in Bosnia... I have more foreign relations experience... okay, maybe I didn't really dodge bullets.. but I'm still better." Whatever.
What I do believe is that either way, the issues facing the country aren't who Obama's pastor is... or what did or didn't happen on the tarmac in Bosnia... or the fact that McCain was a POW. They're bigger than that. Economy, Iraq war, education, the global economy, and IMHO global warming and climate change. The issues that should matter aren't really the ones you'll hear 200 words about on the evening news. They're not dramatic, they're boring. Those are the ones that really matter, not the media sensationalizing of everything stupid.
I think Obama is stuck in a situation with his pastor that isn't 100% fair. I'm sure the Clintons have some quite unsavory friends as well, that just hasn't been brought to light yet. Hell, I think Bill isn't the greatest person out there after how he responded to Richardson's change of opinion when he switched from the Clinton to Obama camp. I do like very much though that Obama has been consistently (again, my opinion) on higher ground than Clinton. I don't think he's going to get into the mud like so many others to get elected. At the same time, that scares me. I know the Republicans will drag him through whatever they have to, so maybe he should get dirty. I hope not, though, b/c I hate dirty politics.
And, I hope Obama wins. :-P
--
Ph: 509-389-5395 (Spokane, WA)
PittmanPhoto.com
MySpace
Follow me on twitter
--
Ph: 509-389-5395 (Spokane, WA)
PittmanPhoto.com
MySpace
Follow me on twitter
Previous PageNext Page